Pages

Monday, May 12, 2014

In One Ear...

Shortly after I moved to the Noog, one of my ears became blocked by wax.  That had never happened before in my life, so I blamed it on the sudden return to a humid climate.

It has happened again (same ear).  Is it because of humidity again?  (If so, why a year after I moved here?)  Is it air pressure?  Is it the way I sleep, or my pillow?

Wax-melting eardrops restored me to partial hearing on Saturday, but I reclogged Sunday.  I had partial hearing for a short time this morning.  The rest of the day, I've walked around, turning my good ear to people who talk to me, and developing a headache just on the deaf side of my head.

Another inconvenience may lead me to temporarily change the radio station in my car.  When you're living with just one ear, a classical radio station can confuse one's brain into thinking it hears a siren or one of one's mobile phones.

5 comments:

  1. I am he who treads a dangerous path; I put the swab all the way into my ear canal.

    Never really have had an issue with wax since I have been doing it. I don't let it build up in the first place.

    I wait until after I shower so the wax is soft. But the drops are probably a better way to clean the canal if it has lots of buildup, otherwise you run the risk of impacting the wax.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Oops. I had the blogger cookies blocked.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Ear wax is ridiculously annoying. Did you try syringing out your ears? Sometimes that works, although it always takes me entirely too many attempts.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I run a cotton swab outside the ear canal after using the drops, but it doesn't collect much of anything. I probably ought to get a syringe, or go see a doctor.

    ReplyDelete
  5. If it's impacted enough to affect your hearing, you're not going to get it out with a swab. (And, of course, shouldn't poke any further into the ear than you already did.) A few days' worth of drops followed by syringing might do it, but it can be difficult. A doctor can syringe it out for you much more efficiently, but, of course, much more expensively.

    ReplyDelete